<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <author>
    <name>Metaweb</name>
    <uri>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/user/metaweb</uri>
  </author>
    <generator uri="http://www.freebase.com/">Freebase Atom Feed Generator</generator>
    <id>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/en/chicago</id>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.freebase.com:80/feed/discuss/topic/en/chicago"/>
    <title>Chicago</title>
    <updated>2008-09-07T01:43:06Z</updated>
  <entry>
    <author>
    <name>nix</name>
    <uri>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/user/nix</uri>
  </author>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;the "name" property is defined and used as a "primary display name".  so its&lt;br /&gt;
appropriate value is in fact driven by the available ui.  the best display name for a topic&lt;br /&gt;
will vary by context so this will always be chosen by compromise, and including the state&lt;br /&gt;
in the display name does seem like the best compromise for almost all us cities.  if you&lt;br /&gt;
want to argue that chicago is exceptional, i think you would have a good case - wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
leaves off the "illinois" qualifier in the article name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and i strongly agree that /location/citytown should have *some* property holding the city name&lt;br /&gt;
without any qualifiers.  setting that up effectively will require a mass data operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <id>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000005dcfc00</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.freebase.com:80/view/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000005dcfc00" title="Chicago: “Chicago” versus “Chicago, Illinois”"/>
    <summary type="html">the "name" property is defined and used as a "primary display name". so its
appropriate value is...</summary>
    <title>Chicago: “Chicago” versus “Chicago, Illinois”</title>
    <updated>2007-09-29T03:10:50.0007Z</updated>
  </entry><entry>
    <author>
    <name>etanwexler</name>
    <uri>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/user/etanwexler</uri>
  </author>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;If I understand correctly, the difficulty of making a good user interface is leading to the deliberate corruption of data. Do I understand correctly?&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <id>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000005c935fd</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.freebase.com:80/view/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000005c935fd" title="Chicago: “Chicago” versus “Chicago, Illinois”"/>
    <summary type="html">If I understand correctly, the difficulty of making a good user interface is leading to the...</summary>
    <title>Chicago: “Chicago” versus “Chicago, Illinois”</title>
    <updated>2007-09-20T01:49:02.0000Z</updated>
  </entry><entry>
    <author>
    <name>jeff</name>
    <uri>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/user/jeff</uri>
  </author>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;You'd be surprised what weird assertions get made because of topics with the same names, actually.  Most, or at least very many, cities have state or country in the name because of the fact that, without them, it's hard to know which city is which (Manchester, England vs. Manchester, New Hampshire, for example -- someone actually flagged them for merge because they were confused as to which was which). Usually if you read the article or can see all the data, it's pretty clear, but if you're selecting from a list while filling in a property, there often isn't enough information to tell them apart otherwise.  I'm not saying that this is ideal, or that we mightn't find ways to make this work better in the future, though.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <id>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000005c8fd61</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.freebase.com:80/view/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000005c8fd61" title="Chicago: “Chicago” versus “Chicago, Illinois”"/>
    <summary type="html">You'd be surprised what weird assertions get made because of topics with the same names, actually. ...</summary>
    <title>Chicago: “Chicago” versus “Chicago, Illinois”</title>
    <updated>2007-09-17T17:35:18.0000Z</updated>
  </entry><entry>
    <author>
    <name>danm</name>
    <uri>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/user/danm</uri>
  </author>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;This is the convention we've used in Freebase for all US cities. This becomes more obviously useful when disambiguating between cities with the same name, for instance &lt;a href="/view/search?limit=30&amp;start=0&amp;query=rockville"&gt;Rockville&lt;a/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <id>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000005c8fd4b</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.freebase.com:80/view/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000005c8fd4b" title="Chicago: “Chicago” versus “Chicago, Illinois”"/>
    <summary type="html">This is the convention we've used in Freebase for all US cities. This becomes more obviously useful...</summary>
    <title>Chicago: “Chicago” versus “Chicago, Illinois”</title>
    <updated>2007-09-17T17:31:34.0000Z</updated>
  </entry><entry>
    <author>
    <name>etanwexler</name>
    <uri>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/user/etanwexler</uri>
  </author>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Why is the name currently “Chicago, Illinois” as opposed to just “Chicago”? Are users having trouble distinguishing the city from the band?&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <id>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000005c8eca5</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.freebase.com:80/view/guid/9202a8c04000641f8000000005c8eca5" title="Chicago: “Chicago” versus “Chicago, Illinois”"/>
    <summary type="html">Why is the name currently “Chicago, Illinois” as opposed to just “Chicago”? Are users having...</summary>
    <title>Chicago: “Chicago” versus “Chicago, Illinois”</title>
    <updated>2007-09-16T15:58:57.0005Z</updated>
  </entry>
</feed>