<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <author>
    <name>mwcl_musicbrainz</name>
    <uri>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/user/mwcl_musicbrainz</uri>
  </author>
    <generator uri="http://www.freebase.com/">Freebase Atom Feed Generator</generator>
    <id>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/en/preface</id>
    <link rel="self" href="http://www.freebase.com:80/feed/discuss/topic/en/preface"/>
    <title>Proem</title>
    <updated>2008-08-21T16:20:43Z</updated>
  <entry>
    <author>
    <name>krsalis</name>
    <uri>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/user/krsalis</uri>
  </author>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When data were imported from wikipedia, two separate topics (one on &amp;quot;Proem,&amp;quot; the musician (aka Richard Bailey), and &amp;quot;Preface,&amp;quot; (aka proem--a preamble) were combined.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've noticed several import results&amp;nbsp;like this one.&amp;nbsp; Is there any effort to better read wikipedia's disambiguation pages so as to not combine unrelated topics?&amp;nbsp; The&amp;nbsp;conflations are sometimes quite funny, but inaccurate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
    <id>http://www.freebase.com:80/view/guid/9202a8c04000641f80000000076b2e69</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.freebase.com:80/view/guid/9202a8c04000641f80000000076b2e69" title="Proem: Richard Bailey conflated with Preface"/>
    <summary type="html">When data were imported from wikipedia, two separate topics (one on &amp;quot;Proem,&amp;quot; the musician...</summary>
    <title>Proem: Richard Bailey conflated with Preface</title>
    <updated>2008-03-09T00:40:26.0005Z</updated>
  </entry>
</feed>